A.I. BURNASYAN FMBC CLINICAL BULLETIN

ISSN 2782-6430 (print)

State Research Center −Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical
Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

The journal is published in Russian.
Format – A4.
The periodicity of the journal is 4 times a year.

Issue №1, 2026

A.I. Burnasyan  FMBC clinical bulletin. 2025 № 4

T.A. Galkina1, A.A. Maydanova1,2, Z.V. Surnina3, M.V. Nersesyan2,4, V.I. Popadyuk2

Use of Cohesive Viscoelastic to Maintain the Patency of the Lacrimal Ducts:
Our Experience

1International Office, State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russiа

2Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow

3FGBNU Research Institute of Eye Diseases named after. MM. Krasnova, Moscow

4Ilyinskaya Hospital, Center for Head and Neck Surgery, Moscow region, g.o. Krasnogorsk

Contact person: Maydanova Anastasiya Aleksandrovna: amaydanova@yandex.ru

 

Abstract
Recanalization of the lacrimal ducts (LD) is a low-trauma surgical intervention aimed at restoring their patency. However, the need to use a lacrimal stents (LS) during the intervention is associated with a number of possible intra- and postoperative complications.

Purpose: the aim of the study is to develop a modification of the recanalization of the nasolacrimal duct in patients with complete acquired obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct, during which subsequent installation of a silicone LS is not required to maintain patency of the nasolacrimal duct in the postoperative period.

Material and methods: the study included 5 patients (5 cases) with primary postsaccal obliteration of the nasolacrimal duct, who underwent complex treatment according to our proposed method, aimed at restoring the patency of the nasolacrimal duct. The postoperative observation period was 6 months. The anatomical and functional results were assessed using both subjective (determination of the severity of lacrimation according to the Munk scale) and objective criteria (tests with fluorescein, rinsing the nasolacrimal duct, performing rhinoendoscopy).

Results: in all cases, anatomical and functional patency of the LD was achieved. No intra- or postoperative complications were noted during the study.

Conclusion: in order to reduce the likelihood of complications associated with the insertion and placement of the LS in the lumen of the LD, during recanalization, subsequent introduction of viscoelastic is possible as an alternative to the silicone LS.

Keywords: lacrimal drainage system, recanalization, viscoelastic

For citation: Galkina TA, Maydanova AA, Surnina ZV, Nersesyan MV, Popadyuk VI. Use of Cohesive Viscoelastic to Maintain the Patency of the Lacrimal Ducts: Our Experience. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center Clinical Bulletin. 2025.4:108-114. (In Russian) DOI: 10.33266/2782-6430-2025-4-108-114

 

REFERENCES

  1. Javate R.M. Optimizing Clinical Outcomes for Endoscopic Lacrimal Duct Recanalization in Patients with Complete PANDO. Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;43;1:175-184. Doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02414-2.
  2. Dave T.V., Ali M.J. Intubation in Lacrimal Surgery. Devices and Techniques. Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery. Singapore, Springer, 2018. P. 405–418.
  3. Munk P.L., Lin D.T., Morris D.C. Epiphora: Treatment by Means of Dacryocystoplasty with Balloon Dilation of the Nasolacrimal Drainage Apparatus. Radiology. 1990;177;3:687-690. Doi: 10 .1148/radiology.177.3.2243969.
  4. Ali M.J., Paulsen F. Human Lacrimal Drainage System Reconstruction, Recanalization, and Regeneration. Curr Eye Res. 2020 Mar;45;3:241-252. Doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1580376. Epub 2019 Feb 22. PMID: 30793623.
  5. At’kova Ye.L. Sistemnyy Podkhod k Diagnostike i Lecheniyu Dakriostenoza = A Systems Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dacryostenosis. Doctor’s Thesis (Med). Moscow, Nauchn-Issledovatel’skiy Institut Glaznykh Bolezney Publ., 2019. 384 p. (In Russ.).
  6. At’kova Ye.L., Krakhovetskiy N.N., Yartsev V.D. Modified Method of Dacryostomy Intubation during Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy. Oftal’mologicheskiye Vedomosti = Ophthalmology Reports. 2015;8;4:16-23 (In Russ).
  7. Instructions for Use of the Medical Product Viscoprotector Cogevisc®. TU 32.50.50-011-64260974-2018 (In Russ.).
  8. Baddeley P.A., Lewis G.D., Lane C.M. A Novel Technique to Facilitate Dacryocystectomy Using Viscoelastic Substances. Orbit. 2011 Jun;30;3:158-9. Doi: 10.3109/01676830.2011.556304. PMID: 21574806.
  9. Beldovskaya N.Yu., Karpishchenko S.A., Shavgulidze M.A., Farikova E.E. The First Experience of Using a Drainage Implant to Eliminate Epiphora in Patients with Rhinogenous Pathology. Oftal’mologicheskiye Vedomosti = Ophthalmology Reports. 2018;11;2:69–73 (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17816/OV11269-73.
  10. At’kova Ye.A., Yartsev V.D. Sposob Zondirovaniya Slezootvodyashchikh Putey pri Neprokhodimosti Ust’ya Nososleznogo Protoka = Method for Probing the Lacrimal Ducts in Case of Obstruction of the Nasolacrimal Duct Orifice. Patent RU 2760995 C1, April 30, 2021. Moscow Publ., 2021 (In Russ.).

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 22.08.2025. Accepted for publication: 05.10.2025

Scroll to Top